• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Brunini Law
Menu
  • About Us
      • Firm Overview
      • Diversity Matters
      • In the Community
      • Pro Bono
      • Legal Networks
      • Brunini, Grantham, Grower & Hewes, PLLC, founded over one century ago, today is one of Mississippi’s largest and most respected law firms. Our Firm’s practice is organized into three major areas of concentration: Commercial, Litigation and Regulatory law. Whether in a courtroom or the boardroom, we treat our client's business as we would our own.
    Close
  • About Us
  • People
      • Attorney Directory
      • Attorney Search
      • As one of Mississippi's oldest law firms, many of our attorneys have unmatched experience in industry sectors ranging from Energy to Telecommunications - from Litigation to Cyber Security.
    Close
  • People
  • Practices
      • Commercial
      • Litigation
      • Regulatory
      • The practice of law at Brunini is diverse, comprehensive and sophisticated. The scope of our services is coordinated across clients, industries and issues. The Brunini Firm is organized into three major areas of concentration that function optimally within the context of the law itself: Commercial, Litigation and Regulatory.
    Close
  • Practices
  • Careers
      • Recruiting
      • Summer Associates
      • Diversity
      • The Brunini Firm recruits new quality attorneys to meet its clients' increasing demands. The Firm interviews at a number of law schools and has an active summer clerkship program which is an integral part of its overall recruiting effort. We also recruit experienced attorneys with proven abilities and particular expertise to help us meet our clients' specific needs.
    Close
  • Careers
  • News
      • News
      • Blog
      • Recent Experience
      • Rankings & Awards
      • Newsletters
      • Newsletter Signup
      • Check here often for firm news, blogs, rankings and awards, and other recent developments involving Brunini and its lawyers. You can also review recent firm newsletters here and sign up to receive the newsletters by email.
    Close
  • News
  • Office
      • Jackson
      • P: 601-948-3101
        190 East Capitol Street
        The Pinnacle Building, Suite 100
        Jackson, MS 39201
    Close
  • Office
    • Jackson
    • Close

What You Should Do When the Special Agent Comes

March 6, 2014 by Brunini Law

IRS tax auditor man with a stern or mean expression

IRS tax auditor man with a stern or mean expression

Persons who have no criminal history and who would seem to be unlikely candidates for criminal accusations sometimes unexpectedly find themselves sitting across the desk from a Special Agent, Criminal Investigation Division (CID) of the Internal Revenue Service.  The Special Agent arrives with no warning.

In fact, according to CID statistics released recently, 5,314 cases were initiated in 2013 alone.  CID recommended 4,364 cases for prosecution during the same year.  IRS claims a  conviction rate of 93 percent on criminal cases during 2013. Of course, guilty pleas are considered convictions for statistical purposes.

“Our cases involved individuals and corporations from all segments of society,” Richard Weber, Chief of Criminal Investigation, said in the report. “They led us into corporate board rooms, offices of public officials, tax preparation businesses, identity theft  and narcotics trafficking organizations.”

So what does one do if a CID Special Agent shows up at your home or office, flashes a badge and states he wishes to ask you a few questions?  You should politely, but firmly, decline to answer any questions.  This is your right as guaranteed by the Constitution, and is assuredly in your best interest.

As one who has represented a number of CID “targets,” I can unequivocally tell you that many are the persons who thought they could talk their way out of this unpleasant situation, but instead created  lengthy and expensive investigations.  This is true even if prospective defendants are totally innocent.  The initial interview of the taxpayer target is frequently the most important step in the investigation for CID.  Accordingly, it is imperative that the target not answer any questions and proceed to engage an attorney who is experienced in criminal tax matters.  The attorney will be in a much better position to evaluate defenses and determine what, if any, information should be shared with CID.

Bipartisan Policy Center’s Electric Grid Cybersecurity Initiative, co-chaired by Brunini’s Hébert releases report

March 4, 2014 by Brunini Law

On February 28, 2014, the Bipartisan Policy Center announced its Electric Grid Cybersecurity Initiative had prepared a report titled “Cybersecurity and the North American Electric Grid:  New Policy Approaches to Address an Evolving Threat.”  Brunini’s Curt Hébert serves as co-chairman for this initiative.

The report released discusses recommendations made by the initiative that could be put into place to protect the electronic grid from cyber-attacks.

Click here to read the entire report and here for the press release

Throughout the weekend, Mr. Hébert provided several interviews; follow the links below to view.

Reuters Interview

Bloomberg Business Week

Brunini Explains 2014 Gift Tax Exemption

February 28, 2014 by Joseph E. Varner III

A pig bank and blocks remind people of the tax season.

The estate and gift tax exemption for 2014 has increased to $5,340,000. The rate remains at 40%. The gift tax exclusion remains at $14,000 per donee.

Just 20 short years ago, the estate and gift tax exemption was $600,000, the top rate was 55%, and the gift tax exclusion was $10,000 per donee.

So if a married couple collectively worth $10,680,000 both die in 2014, their estate tax bill will be $0. If that same couple with the same net worth both died in 1994, their estate tax bill would have been $5,322,000.

Final Regulations Issued on ACA’s 90 Day Waiting Period

February 24, 2014 by Lynne K. Green

Calendar fragment with half-opened sheets in different angles

On February 20, 2014, the trio of Affordable Care Act implementing Agencies [the IRS, DOL and HHS] announced the 90 day waiting period final regulations. Press Release. The regulations are to be published in the Federal Register on February 24th.

Under the final regulations, group health plans (insured and self-funded) and group insurance issuers may not impose a waiting period of more than 90 days before coverage is offered to employees who are coverage eligible. Final Regulations.  The 90 day waiting period counts all calendar days, including weekends and holidays, and begins on the first date of enrollment.

The final regulations continue to allow a plan to establish substantive eligibility conditions such as certain job classifications, licensure requirements, minimum service hours and bona fide employment orientation periods.  For example, a plan may impose an hours of service requirement not to exceed 1,200 hours, and the plan may impose a 90 day waiting period beginning the first day after the hours of service requirement is met.

The final regulations also provide rules for “variable hour employees” – employees who might be full-time but, because their hours are uncertain, the employer has difficulty determining.  If a plan requires a minimum hours of service per period to be eligible for coverage (e.g., 30 hours per week), the employer may measure its variable hour employees for up to 12 months before determining whether they are eligible for coverage.  However, coverage must be made effective no later than 13 months after the variable hour employee’s start date plus, if the employee’s start date is not the first day of a calendar month, the time remaining until the first day of the next calendar month.

For example, under Employer’s group health plan, only full-time employees are eligible for coverage. Employee begins employment on November 26 of Year 1 as a variable hour employee. Under the plan’s terms, variable-hour employees are eligible to enroll in the plan if they are determined to be a full-time employee after a measurement period of 12 months that begins on the employee’s start date. Coverage is made effective no later than the first day of the first calendar month after the applicable enrollment forms are received. Employee’s 12-month measurement period ends November 25 of Year 2. Employee is determined to be a full-time employee and is notified of his plan eligibility. If he then elects coverage, Employee’s first day of coverage will be January 1 of Year 3.  This example is compliant with the final regulations.

The final regulations also provide that with respect to a HIPAA late enrollee or special enrollee, any period before the late or special enrollment date is not a waiting period and, thus, the 90 day waiting period can be imposed.

Contemporaneous with the issuance of the final regulations, proposed regulations were also published on February 20, 2014 seeking to clarify what constitutes a bona fide employment orientation period.  Proposed Regulations. The proposal opts for the imposition of a maximum orientation period of one month [calendar month minus one calendar day] before the 90 day waiting period begins.  Employers implementing these orientation periods should be prepared to demonstrate employment based reasons to prevent a finding they were attempting to avoid the 90 day waiting period.

President Obama Signs Executive Order Establishing Minimum Wage for Federal Contact Employees

February 14, 2014 by Christopher R. Fontan

bigstock-Minimum-Wage-Word-Cloud-6561851-01772689-227x300Following through on a promise made in his State of the Union Address, President Barack Obama formally signed an Executive Order on February 12, 2014, establishing a separate minimum wage for employees of federal contract workers.  Effective January 1, 2015, the minimum wage for most Federal contractor employees shall be set at $10.10 per hour.  “Tipped workers,” employed pursuant to a Federal contract, are to be paid a minimum of $4.90 per hour, with incremental increases to begin in 2016.  Additionally, beginning January 1, 2016, the Executive Order allows for the Secretary of Labor to modify this separate minimum wage (after providing at least 90 days’ notice of such modification).  The Executive Order expressly incorporates existing definitions and regulations under the Fair Labor Standards Act (29 U.S.C. 201 et seq.), the Davis Bacon Act (40 U.S.C. 3141 et seq.) and the Service Contract Act (40 U.S.C. 6701 et. seq.).

While this increase does not impact employers of non-governmental contractors, President Obama stated that his ultimate goal is for passage of legislation increasing the federal minimum wage for allworkers to levels commensurate with this Executive Order.

Click here to read entire order.

Treasury Issues Employer Mandate Regulations

February 12, 2014 by IT Support

On Monday, February 10, the Treasury Department and Internal Revenue Service issued long-awaited final regulations implementing the Affordable Care Act’s employer shared responsibility rules.  Commonly known as the “employer mandate,” the Act provides that applicable large employers may be penalized for failing to offer their full‐time employees an opportunity to enroll in health coverage, or if the coverage offered is unaffordable or does not provide minimum value.  (Applicable large employers are those who employed an average of at least 50 full-time employees on business days during the preceding calendar year, and employers with fewer employees are not subject to the employer mandate rules.)

Originally slated to become effective January 1, 2014, the Treasury Department and IRS issued proposed regulations in December 2012.  A few months later, though, the White House announced a one-year delay in enforcement of the employer mandate.  For the most part, the 227-page final regulation should adopt the earlier proposed rules, though not without a few notable changes:

  • One-year delay for midsize employers.  The employer mandate will only apply to employers with 100 or more full-time employees in 2015.  Employers with between 50 and 99 full-time employees won’t have to comply with the employer mandate until 2016, although they will have to certify that they are not cutting employees or reducing hours for purposes of falling below the 100 employee mark.
  • Relaxed requirement for very large employers.  The proposed regulations required applicable large employers to offer coverage to at least 95 percent of full-time employees to be considered compliant with the employer mandate.  The final regulations relax the requirement, phasing in the percentage of full-time employees that must be offered coverage from 70 percent in 2015 to 95 percent in 2016 and beyond.
  • Volunteers not counted as full-time employees. There had been some debate in Washington over whether volunteers (particularlyvolunteer firefighters and emergency responders) would count as full-time employees.  Commenters explained that volunteer service would be discouraged if employers were required to count volunteer hours when determining whether individuals are full-time employees.  Therefore, the final regulations clarify that service hours do not include hours worked as a “bona fide volunteer.”
  • Other.  There are several smaller adjustments.  Many of the fine-tunings relate to how employers are required to calculate employee work hours.  Seasonal employees, student work-study programs, adjunct faculty, and other employment situations present unique challenges, which the final regulations address.

Click here for the Treasury Department’s press release.

Welcome to Our New Environmental Law Blog

February 11, 2014 by Brunini Law

Brunini’s environmental practice group is widely acknowledged as a statewide leader. Our attorneys have broad experience in both environmental litigation and regulatory proceedings and we are eager to share our ideas, opinions and commentary with you on our new Environmental Law Blog.

Our goal is to provide some perspective on developments within the realm of environmental law. Our blogs will not just be about what happened, we’ll also try to explain the “how” and the “why” the issues we’ll report on matter. Our goal is to provide information that is of true value and interest to you and your business.

And we encourage you, the reader, to comment on our blog entries. Let us know if you think we missed the point or if you find issues that we did not consider. Our new blogs gives us all an opportunity to share our thoughts and ideas and to keep the conversation moving forward on topics that interest and move us all regarding environmental law.

Look for new blog posts to the Brunini Blog every week. Or, we invite you to sign up to receive an e-mail notification whenever a new blog is posted. Look for the sign up option on this page. We look forward to hearing your comments about our blogs and hope you will become a regular reader.

Welcome to the New Brunini Blog

February 10, 2014 by Brunini Law

keyboardBrunini, Grantham, Grower & Hewes, PLLC is pleased to launch the Brunini Blog. While our firm was founded over a century ago, we strive to embrace the latest technological advances so that we may provide our clients the highest quality service possible. So, this blog is a fitting step for us to take in order to enhance our communication efforts with clients and potential clients.

We have defined several goals for the Brunini Blog. The first of these goals is our hope to acknowledge the firm’s heritage as one of Mississippi’s largest and most respected law firms.  Additionally, our plan is to utilize the Brunini Blog to celebrate our longstanding commitment to our clients, our communities and our profession.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 3
  • Page 4
  • Page 5

sidebar

News

  • News
  • Blog
  • Recent Experience
  • Rankings & Awards
  • Newsletters
    • Banking
    • Brunini Update
    • Environmental Law
    • Labor and Employment
    • Health Care
  • Newsletter Signup
  • Jackson
Facebook LinkedIn Instagram
©2026 Brunini. All rights reserved. Web Site by Fishman Marketing.
  • Firm Access
  • Disclaimer
  •