• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Brunini Law
Menu
  • About Us
      • Firm Overview
      • Diversity Matters
      • In the Community
      • Pro Bono
      • Legal Networks
      • Brunini, Grantham, Grower & Hewes, PLLC, founded over one century ago, today is one of Mississippi’s largest and most respected law firms. Our Firm’s practice is organized into three major areas of concentration: Commercial, Litigation and Regulatory law. Whether in a courtroom or the boardroom, we treat our client's business as we would our own.
    Close
  • About Us
  • People
      • Attorney Directory
      • Attorney Search
      • As one of Mississippi's oldest law firms, many of our attorneys have unmatched experience in industry sectors ranging from Energy to Telecommunications - from Litigation to Cyber Security.
    Close
  • People
  • Practices
      • Commercial
      • Litigation
      • Regulatory
      • The practice of law at Brunini is diverse, comprehensive and sophisticated. The scope of our services is coordinated across clients, industries and issues. The Brunini Firm is organized into three major areas of concentration that function optimally within the context of the law itself: Commercial, Litigation and Regulatory.
    Close
  • Practices
  • Careers
      • Recruiting
      • Summer Associates
      • Diversity
      • The Brunini Firm recruits new quality attorneys to meet its clients' increasing demands. The Firm interviews at a number of law schools and has an active summer clerkship program which is an integral part of its overall recruiting effort. We also recruit experienced attorneys with proven abilities and particular expertise to help us meet our clients' specific needs.
    Close
  • Careers
  • News
      • News
      • Coronavirus Updates
      • Blog
      • Recent Experience
      • Rankings & Awards
      • Newsletters
      • Newsletter Signup
      • Check here often for firm news, blogs, rankings and awards, and other recent developments involving Brunini and its lawyers. You can also review recent firm newsletters here and sign up to receive the newsletters by email.
    Close
  • News
  • Office
      • Jackson
      • P: 601-948-3101
        190 East Capitol Street
        The Pinnacle Building, Suite 100
        Jackson, MS 39201
    Close
  • Office
    • Jackson
    • Close

Appellate

At every level of the Federal and State appellate systems, Brunini’s lawyers have successfully represented their clients in complex appeals.  We have represented a broad array of clients in cases on appeal following the firm’s representation of those clients at the trial level, and we also have been retained to serve as appellate counsel in cases that were handled at trial by other attorneys. From product liability, intellectual property and commercial disputes to mass tort, personal injury and constitutional issues, our appellate lawyers have an exceptional depth and breadth of experience upon which to draw in guiding our clients through the appellate process.  Additionally, as a result of our broad appellate practice and successful track record, the firm is regularly engaged by industry trade associations to draft amicus curiae briefs in significant cases, including complex product liability and mass/toxic tort cases.  Indeed, in 2012, Brunini was selected as the Benchmark Appellate Law Firm for the South, which includes Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia and West Virginia.

Brunini counts among its lawyers former law clerks to the Mississippi Supreme Court, Mississippi Court of Appeals, and the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. As a result of these experiences, our appellate lawyers have a unique understanding of both the inner-workings of the State and Federal appellate systems, as well as the process by which appellate judges decide cases.

Brunini’s appellate lawyers can provide guidance regarding each of the following:

  • How to preserve the trial record for appeal
  • Whether to pursue immediate appellate review of interlocutory orders via interlocutory appeal or writ of mandamus
  • Drafting petitions for interlocutory appeal, writs of mandamus and petitions for certiorari
  • State or Federal appellate jurisdiction and procedures
  • Drafting appellate briefs and conducting oral arguments
  • Identifying amicus curiae opportunities and drafting amicus briefs

Primary Contacts

  • William Trey Jones III

Practice Attorneys

  • Cody C. Bailey
  • R. Lane Bobo
  • Jacob A. Bradley
  • Stephen J. Carmody
  • R. Richard Cirilli, Jr.
  • William D. Drinkwater
  • Christopher R. Fontan
  • Karen E. Howell
  • William Trey Jones III
  • Claire W. Ketner
  • M. Patrick McDowell
  • L. Kyle Williams

Representative Matters

  • On December 8, 2011, the Mississippi Supreme Court reversed a jury verdict and rendered judgment in favor of Brunini’s client, Trustmark National Bank.  Roxco, Ltd. was a general construction contractor on several projects for the State of Mississippi.  Roxco utilized the state statute that allows contractors to pledge securities in lieu of the retainage on the contract, and the securities were held at Trustmark.  Following Roxco’s default on several projects, the State of Mississippi requested that Trustmark turn the securities over to the State.  Roxco objected, but Trustmark turned the securities over to the State.  Roxco filed suit against Trustmark alleging various torts and breach of contract.   The Hinds County Circuit Judge denied Trustmark’s request that the case be dismissed, and a jury awarded Roxco $3,720,000.  Trustmark appealed.  The Mississippi Supreme Court concluded that Trustmark’s actions were consistent with state law and that the undisputed trial evidence did not warrant a recovery by Roxco.  The Supreme Court reversed the jury verdict and rendered judgment for Trustmark. [Opinion and Order]
  • On May 16, 2011, a three-Judge Federal Panel ruled that the Secretary of State’s position — “that it is premature for this Court to impose any remedy because neither the Mississippi Constitution nor the United States Constitution require the Legislature to reapportion itself until next year” is correct. [Opinion and Order]. The Panel found that “[w]e agree with the Secretary of State’s position that imposition of a remedy is premature and allow the 2011 legislative election to proceed under the present districts.”  The Panel noted that the Legislature is to reapportion itself every 10 years and since the last redistricting was in 2002, the 10 years has not passed and, thus, it is not proper at this time for the federal courts to “order around [the] state legislature”. The NAACP appealed the decision to the United States Supreme Court.  Trey Jones, Joseph Sclafani and Matt Allen worked on the appeal on behalf of Secretary of State Hosemann.  On October 31, 2011, the Court affirmed the decision of the three-Judge panel.
  • Represented client before Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals and obtained reversal on tax issue. Court found that client was entitled to refund of the federal gift taxes and penalties paid to the IRS. Tatum v. United States of America, No. 10-60852 (August 8, 2011).
  • The Firm represented Koppers, Inc. and Beazer East, Inc. in a personal injury action arising out of alleged exposure to harmful levels of toxic chemicals. The Mississippi Supreme court affirmed their dismissal based on failure of the plaintiff’s expert to provide causal link between injuries and alleged contamination. Collins v. Koppers, Inc. et al, No. 2009-CA-01678-SCT (April 21, 2011)
  • On May 25, 2011, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the United States District Court of Southern Mississippi’s dismissal of Georgia Gulf Chemicals & Vinyls, LLC. The employee sued Georgia Gulf Chemicals & Vinyls, LLC for wrongful termination asserting he had been fired after he reported that another employee had assaulted him. The District Court, Judge Lee, held that since there was no evidence that the employer authorized or ratified the assault or that it occurred in the scope of employment then the termination was not wrongful as no exception to Mississippi’s employment-at-will doctrine had been demonstrated. The Fifth Circuit found Judge Lee’s reasoning to be accurate and, thus, affirmed in summary fashion. Hall v. Georgia Gulf Chemicals & Vinyls, LLC, No 11-60022 (5th Cir. 2011) and 3:10cv512 (USDC MS 2010).
  • After a four day jury trial, Business Communications, Inc., represented by Brunini won a unanimous jury verdict enforcing a covenant not to compete against a former employee who violated the terms of his employment agreement by going to work for a direct competitor. The Circuit Court Judge overturned the jury verdict upon motion by the plaintiff. The Mississippi Court of Appeals reversed the trial court’s action and remanded the case to the trial court to rule on BCI’s attorneys’ fees motion.  Business Communications, Inc. v. Banks, 2011 WL 590913 (Miss.Ct.App. 2011).
  • Successful in obtaining a favorable ruling from the Mississippi Supreme Court which overruled a lower decision from the Mississippi Workers Compensation Commission.  The MWCC previously found Brunini’s client liable under the Mississippi Workers Compensation Act for a former employee’s loss of wage earning capacity, based on her failure to return to pre-injury job as a result of her Union contract. Brunini appealed this decision, arguing that the MWCC should not consider such factors when evaluating loss of wage earning capacity. Omnova Solutions, Inc. v. Theresa Lipa; 44 So.3d 935 (Miss. 2010).
  • Obtained reversal of jury verdict in favor of the plaintiff for $785,000 in complex environmental case. On appeal before the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, the Court held that negligence and conspiracy claims had accrued at the time the plaintiff was diagnosed with cancer and; thus, statute of limitation had run. Barnes ex rel. Estate of Barnes v. Koppers, Inc. 534 F.3d 357 (5th Cir. 2008).
  • United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit affirmed summary judgment in favor of our client, a publicly-traded financial services client. A putative class action was filed against Trustmark implicating claims under ERISA. The District Court and the Fifth Circuit, in its affirmance, found that the former employees did not have substantive rights to participate in the bank’s profit sharing plans.  Harris v. Trustmark Nat‰’l Bank, 2008 WL 2482348 (5th Cir. 2008).
  • Successfully pursued interlocutory appeal to the Mississippi Supreme Court of a Chancellor’s denial of our client’s Motion to Transfer the litigation from Chancery to Circuit Court.  See ERA v. Mathis, 931 So.2d 1278 (Miss. 2006).
  • Received an affirmance from the Mississippi Supreme Court of the Circuit Court’s Order granting summary judgment to our clients in a pharmaceutical product liability action.  See Price v. Purdue, 920 So.2d 479 (Miss. 2006).
  • Successfully pursued interlocutory appeal to the Mississippi Supreme Court of the Circuit Court’s denial of our clients’ Motion to Sever and Transfer Venue.  See Purdue v. Heffner, 904 So.2d 100 (Miss. 2004).
  • Received an affirmance from the Mississippi Court of Appeals of an Order dismissing plaintiffs’ defamation and emotional distress claims based on the statutory immunity provided to school administrators who report to the State, in good faith, suspected child abuse.  See Howe v. Andereck, 882 So.2d 240 (Miss. Ct. App. 2004).
  • Received an affirmance from the Mississippi Supreme Court of a Chancellor’s Judgment finding a prescriptive easement and awarding attorneys fees to our clients.  See Graves v. Dudley Maples, L.P., 950 So.2d 1017 (Miss. 2007).

Related News

  • Brunini Named Best Law Firm in Mississippi for Third Year in a Row
  • Brunini Law Firm announces that Kyle Williams has rejoined the firm as an Associate in the Firm’s Regulatory Department.
  • Brunini Recognized As Highly Recommended Firm by Benchmark Litigation 2020
  • Benchmark Litigation has named the Brunini firm Mississippi’s “Firm of the Year” for 2016. David Kaufman and Patrick McDowell accepted the award for the firm at the Benchmark Litigation Awards ceremony in New York City on February 11.

sidebar

Back to Practices

Litigation

Practices

  • Commercial
    • Banking
    • Corporate
    • First Amendment / Media
    • Economic Development Tax Incentives
    • ERISA, Employee Benefits, and Executive Compensation
    • Estate Planning, Trusts & Estates, Probate
    • Industrial Project Development
    • Intellectual Property
    • Media and Advertising
    • Mergers and Acquisitions
    • Real Estate
    • Securities
    • Software and Website Development
    • Taxation
    • Zoning and Land Use Regulation
  • Litigation
    • Alternative Dispute Resolution
    • Appellate
    • Bankruptcy and Creditors’ Rights
    • Commercial Litigation
    • Construction
    • Environmental Litigation
    • Intellectual Property Litigation
    • Labor and Employment
    • Personal Injury, Mass Torts, and Product Liability
    • Premises Liability
    • Surety and Fidelity
    • White Collar Criminal Defense
  • Regulatory
    • Utility Easements and Rights of Way
    • Energy Project Development
    • Environmental Law
    • Gaming
    • Government Contracts
    • Governmental Relations
    • Healthcare
    • Natural Gas Storage and Transportation
    • Oil, Gas, and Coal Exploration and Production
    • Public Utilities
    • Telecommunications
  • Jackson
©2023 Brunini. All rights reserved. Web Site by Fishman Marketing.
  • Firm Access
  • Disclaimer
  •